Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
In recent years, there has been a growing trend among educational institutions to prioritize subjects related to science while neglecting subjects such as drama and literature. While some argue that this is a positive development due to the increasing demand for STEM-related careers, I firmly believe that it is a negative development.
Firstly, drama and literature play a crucial role in developing critical thinking and communication skills. These subjects encourage students to analyze complex themes, think creatively, and express their ideas effectively. By neglecting them, educational institutions are depriving students of the opportunity to develop these essential skills that are applicable in any field.
Secondly, drama and literature provide an avenue for emotional expression and empathy-building. Through reading novels or performing in plays, students can explore different perspectives and gain a deeper understanding of human emotions. This fosters empathy and tolerance among individuals, which are vital for creating a harmonious society.
Furthermore, drama and literature contribute to cultural preservation by showcasing the diversity of human experiences. They expose students to different cultures, traditions, and historical events through stories or performances. By ignoring these subjects, educational institutions risk erasing valuable cultural heritage from the curriculum.
In conclusion, prioritizing science-related subjects at the expense of drama and literature is detrimental to students’ overall development. It hinders the acquisition of critical thinking skills, emotional intelligence, empathy-building abilities, and cultural awareness. Therefore, it is imperative that educational institutions strike a balance between science-based disciplines and humanities to ensure holistic education for future generations.